The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dealt with a request for adjournment by Respondent No. 14. The Tribunal directed parties to appear positively on a fixed date, noted the case's age, and denied further adjournment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 46/2010
Between
The Federal Bank Ltd. … Appellant/s V/s. Preet Sonal Investment & Finance Pvt. Ltd. & …Respondent/s Ors.
Mr. Asmita Maurya, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. Somnath Iyer, Advocate for Respondent Nos.2 to 13.
Mr. Parag Kale along with Ms. Vaishali Vanjkara, Advocate for Respondent No.14.
-: Order dated : 28/04/2022 :-
Learned counsel for Respondent No.14 seeks for
adjournment.
The parties are directed to get ready for hearing on the next date, positively.
Post on 25.05.2022 for hearing.
Since the matter is of 2010, no further adjournment will be granted.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj/mks-25
1
The Federal Bank Ltd.
Preet Sonal Investment & Finance Pvt. Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
