Miscellaneous appeal listed via video conference. Court ordered supply of appeal paper book to respondent counsel. Learned counsel for bank deposed non-representative status; name deleted. Further arguments listed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Case No. 900/2019 IN
Misc. Appeal No. 44/2018 Arising out of Dy. No. 3001133/2017 (DRT-III, Delhi)
Madhya Pradesh Power Transmission Company Ltd. Vs Punjab & Sind Bank & Ors.
26.08.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice BrijeshSethi
Present: Mr. Sakesh Kumar, Ld. counsel for the appellant
Mr. AamirShaikh, proxy for Mr. Arun Kumar Shukla, Ld. counsel for respondent bank
Ms. Seema Gupta, Advocate
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Learned counsel for respondent bank states that he has not received the copy of the appeal paper book. Let copy of the appeal paper book be supplied to him within two days. Reply be filed within two weeks and rejoinder, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter.
List for 07.10.2022 for final arguments.
Ms. Seema Gupta, Ld. advocate, submits that she does not represent the bank in the matter and, therefore, her name as counsel may be deleted. At request, the name of Ms. Seema Gupta is deleted as Ld. counsel for the respondent bank.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-pk
Madhya Pradesh Power Transmission Company Ltd.
Punjab & Sind Bank
Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
