Bank of Baroda v. M/S Periyakkal Traders, Rep by Its Proprietor Mr.P.Dharmalingam
DRATMISC APPEAL/44/2018
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Single judge order adjourning matter due to counsel's request by Respondent 4, directing payment of litigation costs.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
¶2
M.A:44/2018
¶3
Bank Of Baroda V/S M/S Periyakkal Traders & Ors
¶4
14/10/2022
¶5
Representing counsel for R4 sought for adjournment.
¶6
On last three occasions, only on request of R4, matter was adjourned and in spite of that no interest is evinced by R4. Ld. Counsel for appellant bank reported ready.
¶7
Therefore, matter is adjourned to 4.11.2022 for arguments on costs of Rs.5000/- to be paid by R4 to appellant.
¶8
Sd/-
¶9
Chairperson
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Bank Of Baroda
- respondent
M/S Periyakkal Traders
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
16 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court