G Naveen Prasath v. City Union Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
TheChairpersondirectedthatnorepresentationwasfiledonbehalfofappellantswhilecounselforR1&R2waspresent.NoticeagainstR3wasnottaken;thusappealagainstR3wasdismissed.Thisorderremainedopenfor{arguments空気?}.
What did the court decide?
Noissuesfiledonbehalfappellant.Sincenothenoticeagainstresponseoremalformedtheappealagainstthirdrespondantwadedasmceasingtoconsiderothercoursedeedforfuturehearing.