Thin order on procedural directions requiring Respondents 2-5 to file proof of service and all Respondents (excluding 6) to file reply. Postponed for 12.10.2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 32/2018
Between
Smt. Vasantibai Krishna Joshi … Appellant/s V/s.
Phoenix ARC Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr. Prafull Mahadik, i/b Mr. H.A. Noronha Advocate for Appellant. Ms. Dimple Tejani, i/b M/s. M & S Legal Ventures, Advocate for Respondent No.1.
-: Order dated: 14/07/2022:-
The learned counsel for the Appellant submits that he has filed a proof of service of notice on Respondent Nos.2 to 5 today.
He will also serve the notice on Respondent No.6 expeditiously.
Reply, if any, shall be filed by Respondent Nos.1, 3, 4, and 5.
Post on 12.10.2022 for reply/proof of service on Respondent
No.6.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj-7
1
Smt. Vasantibai Krishna Joshi
Phoenix ARC Pvt. Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
