Anil Malik v. Bank of Baroda
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Appeal No.314/2022 Arising out of S.A.No. 520/2022(DRT-I, Delhi)
Anil Malik Vs
Bank of Baroda
20.12.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Amit Kumar Mishra, Ld. counsel for appellant
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Appellant has not made any pre-deposit for the entertainment of the appeal. Let the file be consigned to record room and be taken up on an application moved by the appellant for revival of the appeal, after making the requisite pre-deposit.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-pk
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Anil Malik
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Coram
Brijesh Sethi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court