Liaison to determine appellate counsel participation. Application for main Vakalath dismissed due to lack of service affidavit. Respondents given time to file Vakalath.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
M.A(S.A):30/2022
Kerala Fashion Jewellery & Ors V/S Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd & Anr
01/11/2022
Representing counsel for Appellant present.
Affidavit of Service not filed. However Ld. Counsel Ananda Gomathy Murugesan undertakes to file Vakalath for R1 & R2.
Call on 09/11/2022 for Vakalath of R1 & R2.
Sd/Registrar
Kerala Fashion Jewellery & Ors
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd & Anr
As recorded by the court registry
22 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
