M/S Quarmatic Time Industries v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Proceedings on Misc. Appeal No. 29/2021 were adjourned for a week to allow the respondent bank to file a reply, with no further extension granted.
What did the court decide?
Reply to be filed within a week. No further adjournment granted. Matter posted for hearing on 10.05.2022.
What the court decided
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 29/2021
Between
M/s. Quarmatic Time Industries & Anr. … Appellant/s V/s.
State Bank of India …Respondent/s
Mr. R. J. Singh, Advocate for Respondent Bank.
-: Order dated : 22/04/2022 :-
Mr. Dileep B. Nevatia, Appellant No. 2, appeared in person.
Ld. Counsel appearing for the Respondent Bank seeks further adjournment for filing reply even though several opportunities were already given.
Reply, if any, shall be filed within a week. No further adjournment will be granted.
Post the matter on 10.05.2022 for hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/s. Quarmatic Time Industries & Anr
- respondent
State Bank of India
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court