Johnson Thangaiah v. State Bank of India
DRATMISC APPEAL/27/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A single paragraph listing directs the calling of the 12/10/2022 hearing. No presiding judges are named in the text. Proof of service was not filed, but an undertaking was given to file Vakalath. The order contains no substantive disposal, reasoning, or legal proposition.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
¶2
M.A(S.A):27/2022
¶3
Johnson Thangiah & Ors V/S State Bank Of India
¶4
22/09/2022
¶5
Appellant’s counsel present.
¶6
Proof of Service not filed. However, Ld. Counsel Raghavulu Naidu undertakes to file Vakalath for Respondent Bank.
¶7
Call on 12/10/2022.
¶8
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Johnson Thangiah & Ors
- respondent
State Bank Of India
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
17 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court