Bank of Maharashtra v. Madhu Bahl
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-paragraph listing order directing appellant to supply appeal copy, setting timelines for reply and rejoinder, and listing matter for arguments on 23.03.2023.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Appeal No. 22/2022 Arising out of S.A. No. 16/2020 (DRT-I, Delhi)
Bank of Maharashtra Vs Madhu Bahl & Ors.
29.11.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Shivam Sharma, Ld. Counsel for appellant.
Mr. Karan Mehta, Ld. Counsel for respondents.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Ld. Counsel for respondents prays that appellant may be directed to supply the copy of the appeal.
Let copy of the appeal be supplied to the Ld. Counsel for respondents today itself. Let reply be filed by the respondents within four weeks and rejoinder, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter.
List the matter on 23.03.2023 for arguments.
(CHAIRPERSON)
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Bank of Maharashtra
- respondent
Madhu Bahl & Ors.
Coram
Brijesh Sethi
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
7 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court