The Impugned order/judgment is disposed of in accordance with Consent Terms filed by the parties after a settlement was reached.
Order disposed of in accordance with Consent Terms filed by parties.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present :Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 216/2009
Between
The Jain Sahakari Bank Ltd. … Appellant/s V/s. Bank of Baroda & Anr. …Respondent/s
Mr. H.A. Naronha, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. A.R. Bamne, Advocate for Respondent No. 1.
-: Order dated : 11/05/2022 :-
Ld. Counsel appearing on either side submits that the matte has been settled and Consent Terms have been filed. The terms of Consent Terms are recorded.
Hence, Misc. Appeal is disposed of in accordance with Consent Terms, which shall form part of this order.
All other Miscellaneous Applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-3
1
The Jain Sahakari Bank Ltd.
Bank of Baroda & Anr.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
