This order condones a 13-day delay in filing the representation of an appeal. The Chairperson allowed the application (IA 30/2020) after hearing counsel and perusing the affidavit filed by the Bank of Baroda.
Condonance of a 13-day delay in filing the representation of the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 30/2020 & IA 31/2020
In AIR 364/2019
Bank Of Baroda V/S M/S Madras Gauge Room Equipment Pvt Ltd & 2 Ors
11/07/2022
Proof of paper publication filed.
This Application is filed to condone delay of 13 days in representing the Appeal.
Heard Learned Counsel for Petitioner/Appellant Bank and perused Application.
Considering the reasons stated in the Affidavit filed in support of Petition, delay of 13 days in representing the Appeal is condoned. Consequently IA 30/2020 is allowed.
IA 30/2020 (Delay in Re-presentation) is allowed.
Notice to Respondents.
Post the case on 10.08.2022, for filing proof of service.
Sd/Chairperson
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay of 13 days in filing the appeal was sufficient to be condoned.
Bank Of Baroda
M/S Madras Gauge Room Equipment Pvt Ltd
Chairperson
As recorded by the court registry
19 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
