Appeal in a banking recovery matter was dismissed due to non-prosecution as the appellant failed to appear despite repeated calls during the hearing conducted via video conferencing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Appeal No. 09/2022 Arising out of S.A. No. 428/2021 (DRT-I, Delhi)
Mrs. Amarjit Kaur Jolly Vs
M/s Yes Bank Ltd.
18.08.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Ms. Akriti Gautam, Ld. counsel for respondent
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
None has appeared on behalf of the appellant despite repeated calls. The
appeal is, therefore, dismissed for non-prosecution.
File be consigned to Record Room
(CHAIRPERSON)
-ak
Mrs. Amarjit Kaur Jolly
M/s Yes Bank Ltd.
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
