The High Court held that a miscellaneous appeal filed against an interim order became infructuous as a final order on the same matter had already been challenged in a separate appeal. The court dismissed the appeal accordingly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Misc. Appeal No. 04/2022 Date: 01.06.2022
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Vs. Uttar Pradesh State Cement Corporation and Ors.
Present: Shri Sandeep Arora, counsel for the appellant, Shri D. N. Awasthi, counsel for the respondent no. 1,
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the present appeal was filed against the interim order, but now the final order has been passed, against which another appeal has been filed. Thus, the present appeal has become infructuous, hence the same be dismissed.
In view of the submission made by the counsel for the appellant, the present appeal is dismissed as having become infructuous.
Justice R. D. Khare Chairperson
VN Giri
Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
Uttar Pradesh State Cement Corporation
R. D. Khare
VN Giri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
