In an appeal where the respondent failed to appear despite service, the DRAT allowed the appeal MA(SA) 1/20202 through a separate order and directed closure of pending imaginative applications without costs.
Allowed MA(SA) 1/20202; pending IAs closed; no costs.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
MA(SA) 1/2022
Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Co Ltd V/S Palanisamy
05/07/2022
Respondent in spite of service did not appear and remained exparte.
Heard Advocate for appellant.
Appeal MA(SA) 1/20202 is allowed through separate order. No costs.
All pending IAs, if any, stand closed.
Sd/Chairperson
Cholamandalam Investment And Finance Co Ltd
Palanisamy
Chairperson
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
