Shri Sunil S/o. Panmal Zabak v. Bank of Maharashtra & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
No substantive decision was rendered in this order. The matter was posted for hearing with a direction that there shall be no further adjournment.
No substantive decision was rendered in this order. The matter was posted for hearing with a direction that there shall be no further adjournment.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 186/2013
Between
Shri. Sunil S. Panmal Zanak … Appellant/s V/s.
Bank of Maharashtra & 3 Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr. Puneet Gogad, i/b Mr. N. L. Karamchandani, Advocate for Appellant.
Mr. Varun Prakash, i/b M/s. Singhi & Co., Advocate for Respondent No.1.
-: Order dated : 31/05/2022 :-
There is no representation for other Respondents.
This Misc. Appeal is filed challenging the impugned order dated 13.02.2013 dismissing M.A. No. 25/2012, i.e. an application filed for condonation of delay in filing application for setting aside the exparte judgment dated 26.08.2010 in O.A. No. 15/2010 on the file of D.R.T., Nagpur.
The learned counsel appearing for Appellant was heard and he has relied upon a decision of the Hon’ble High Court of Bombay in Nandu D. Chhabria Vs. State Bank of India & Ors. [2012 (5) Bom CR 791] which is to the point and states that the delay can be condoned.
The learned counsel who is representing the counsel for the Respondent No.1 submits that the arguing counsel is not present and seeks adjournment. He submits that the reply has been already filed.
Post on 23.06.2022 for hearing.
There shall be no further adjournment.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj-2
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for condonation of delay should be allowed despite the absence of the answering counsel.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Nandu D. Chhabria Vs. State Bank of India & Ors.Referred¶11
Nandu D. Chhabria Vs. State Bank of India & Ors. [2012 (5) Bom CR 791] · Who else cites this
Shri. Sunil S. Panmal Zanak
Bank of Maharashtra
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court