In Misc. Appeal No.171/2016, the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal closed suo motu proceedings following a High Court judgment precluding such initiation.
The present proceedings stands closed and file be consigned to Record Room.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Appeal No.171/2016 Arising out of S.A.No.61/2008 (DRT-I, Delhi)
G.R.Malhotra&Anr.
Vs
Canara Bank &Anr.
21.07.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice BrijeshSethi
Present: None for the appellant.
Ms. Seema Gupta, Ld. Counsel for the Respondent.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Ld counsel for the respondent states that suo motu proceedings cannot be initiated in view of the Judgment of Hon’ble High Court title
Satyanarayan Rao vs. India Renewable Energy Development Authority, W.P.(C) 1124/2018 , date of Decision 26th November, 2018.
Heard. In view of the above judgment, the present proceedings stands closed and file be consigned to Record Room
(CHAIRPERSON)
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Satyanarayan Rao vs. India Renewable Energy Development AuthorityReferred¶10
Satyanarayan Rao vs. India Renewable Energy Development Authority, W.P.(C) 1124/2018, date of Decision 26th November, 2018
G.R. Malhotra & Anr.
Canara Bank & Anr.
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
