Mr Dhiraj a Mitra v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
This order adjourned a miscellaneous appeal to allow the respondent bank time to file a reply. The tribunal directed that two weeks' notice be served before dispossession of the property.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 162/2022
Between
Dhiraj A Mitra & Anr. … Appellant/s V/s. Bank of Baroda …Respondent/s
…Respondent/s
Mr. Puneet Gogad, Advocate for Appellant. Mr Prakash C., Advocate for Respondent.
-: Order dated: 20/12/2022:-
The matter is taken up for hearing by way of Praecipe filed by Appellant seeking urgent relief.
The Respondent appeared and the learned counsel appearing for the Respondent seeks time to file a reply on I.A. 649/2022 stating that he got the notice served on him only yesterday late in the evening.
The learned counsel for the Appellant insist on ad interim relief stating that he would be dispossessed of the property by the receiver. Since it is not possible to hear the matter in detail without the reply in place, it is directed that the reply shall be filed within a week.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Dhiraj A Mitra & Anr.
- respondent
Bank of Baroda
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court