The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai listed the applications on 3.6.2022 solely for arguments regarding the restoration of the matter due to delay in representation for the appellants.
Direction to list the matter on 3.6.2022 for arguments on restoration due to delay.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 998/2018 & IA 999/2018 In
M.A(S.A):157/2013
M/S.St.Marys Kalmane & Arekal Estates ... Appellants Vs SBI & Ors ... Respondents
30/05/2022
Representing counsel Ms. Yamini G.K. for Ld. Counsel Shri Srinath Sridevan for petitioner/appellant and Ld. Counsel Shri R. Sugumaran for R1 present.
At request of Ld. Counsel for petitioner/appellant, list the matter on 3.6.2022 for arguments in IA 998/2018 (delay in representation in filing restoration).
Sd/Chairperson
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the application for restoration due to delay in representation needs specific directions for hearing?
M/S.St.Marys Kalmane & Arekal Estates
SBI & Ors
Chairperson
As recorded by the court registry
18 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
