In a misc. appeal, the tribunal noted the appellant's applications for exemption and setting aside an order. It granted time to the respondent for filing replies and listed the matter for 29.09.2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Appeal No. 153/2022
Arising out of Appeal No. 02/2022 (DRT, Jaipur)
Rajasthan State Industrial Development & Investment Corporation Ltd. (RIICO) Vs Kotak Mahindra Bank
15.07.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice BrijeshSethi
Present: Mr. Singhvi, Ld. counsel for the appellant.
Ms. Usha Singh, Ld. counsel for the respondent.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Ld. counsel for the appellant has moved two applications i.e. I.A. No. 383/22 for exemption and I.A. No. 384/22 for setting aside the order dated 11.03.22 passed by DRT, Jaipur.
Ms. Usha Singh, Ld. counsel for the respondent accepts notice of the applications and requests for time for filing reply to the same.
Let reply be filed within two weeks and rejoinder, if any, with two weeks thereafter.
Let the matter be listed for 29.09.2022.
(CHAIRPERSON)
Rajasthan State Industrial Development & Investment Corporation Ltd. (RIICO)
Kotak Mahindra Bank
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
