Nakoda Ji and Ors. v. Union Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Division Bench dismissed a revision appeal arising from a DRT judgment by default as the appellant failed to appear despite notice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Appeal No.143/2020 Arising out of S.A.No.52/2022 (DRT-I, Delhi)
Nakodaji Corpo Vs Union Bank of India
20.09.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: None for appellant.
Mr. Amit Kumar Yadav, Ld. Counsel for respondent no.1 bank.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
None has appeared for the appellant today. None had appeared on behalf
of appellant on the last date also.
Appeal is dismissed in default.
(CHAIRPERSON)
N
Nakodaji Corpo
Union Bank of India
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court