Appeal by a bank was dismissed as default due to lack of representation and failure to serve respondents, rendering the appeal infructuous since the underlying DRAT matter was already disposed of.
Appeal dismissed for default; all miscellaneous applications dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 135/2012
Between
Indusind Bank Ltd. … Appellant/s V/s. M/s Indage Vineyards Pvt. Ltd. & Ors. …Respondent/s
M/s Indage Vineyards Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.
-: Order dated : 30/03/2022 :-
There is no representation for Appellant Bank. It is seen that Appellant has also not taken steps of service on Respondents despite giving reasonable opportunities by the Registrar.
It is noted that matter pending before the D.R.T. has already been disposed of, hence the Appeal has become infructuous.
In view of the above fact and that there is no representation for Appellant and no steps have been taken to serve the Respondents, Appeal is dismissed for default.
All Miscellaneous Applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj/mks-16
1
Indusind Bank Ltd.
M/s Indage Vineyards Pvt. Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
