The appeal, arising from a decision by the Debt Recovery Tribunal, was dismissed as withdrawn by the parties, who agreed to vacate the leased premises by the lease expiry date.
To vacate the premises by 14.12.2022; appeal treated as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Appeal No. 132/2022 Arising out of S.A. No. 100/2022 (DRT-II, Chandigarh)
Robogenius Learning Solutions Ltd. Vs
Canara Bank & Ors.
27.09.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Anil Kaushik, Ld. counsel for the appellant. Ms. Seema Gupta, Ld. counsel for the respondent bank.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
Part arguments heard. The lease of the premises in question in the present appeal is going to expire on 14.12.2022.
Ld. counsel for the appellant submits that it will vacate the premises on or before 14.12.2022 and requests for withdrawal of present appeal.
Ld. counsel for the respondent has no objection to the same.
In view of the above, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn and stands disposed of accordingly. Let the appellant now vacate the premises in question as undertaken above.
File be consigned to record room.
(CHAIRPERSON)
Robogenius Learning Solutions Ltd.
Canara Bank & Ors.
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
5 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
