The Appeals Tribunal dismissed the appeal for non-prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the appellant and the requisite pre-deposit was not made.
The appeal was dismissed for non-prosecution. File consigned to record room.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Appeal No. 132/2021 Arising out of S.A. No. 98/2021 (DRT-I, Chandigarh)
Padam Singh & Anr. Vs Ao. State Bank of India & Anr.
16.08.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi Present: None for the applicant.
Mr. Amrendra Kumar Singh, Ld. Counsel for the respondent.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
No one has appeared on behalf of the appellant. Even pre-deposit has not been made.
In view of the above, the application is dismissed for non-prosecution. File be consigned to record room.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-ap
Padam Singh
State Bank of India
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
