The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed Misc. Appeal No. 128/2011 as infructuous. The court held there was no reason to retain the appeal on file following the disposal of the underlying interlocutory application.
The appeal was disposed of as infructuous; it was not retained on file.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson Misc. Appeal No. 128/2011
Between
Bank of Maharashtra V/s.
Subhash Chander Babbar & Ors.
… Appellant/s
…Respondent/s
Mr N.J. Devashrayee, Advocate for Appellant.
1
application. Therefore, the learned Presiding Officer was not justified in rejecting the application on the ground that the applicant could not have sought such a relief, submits the Ld. counsel.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-16
2
Bank of Maharashtra
Subhash Chander Babbar & Ors.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
3 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
