This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
(Caveat No.06,07 & 08/2022) Misc. Appeal No.12/2022 Arising out of S.A.No.74/2019 (DRT-I, Delhi)
M/s Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. Vs
M/s Akanchi Gupta & Ors.
10.11.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. Mahip Datta Parasar, Ld. Counsel for appellant.
Ms. Reena Jain Malhotra, Ld. Counsel for respondents.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing. Miscellaneous Appeal No. 12/2022
Ld. Counsel for the respondents states that the matter has been settled with Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd. and therefore seeks permission to withdraw the appeal.
Ld. Counsel for appellant bank states that however, the matter is under settlement with the respondents but there is status quo order passed by the Ld. DRT-I, Delhi in S.A. No. 74/2019 in operation which is under challenged before this Tribunal, therefore, appropriate direction may be passed that said order will not come into the way of settlement.
Ld. Counsel for appellant bank states that applicant bank does not claim any relief against respondent no.2 i.e. M/s Petrolube India Limited being a proforma respondent.
In view of the above, present appeal is disposed of as withdrawn being settled. However, it is made clear that the status quo order dated 15.04.2021 will not be come in the way of settlement.
File be consigned to record.
(CHAIRPERSON)
N
M/s Kotak Mahindra Bank Ltd.
M/s Akanchi Gupta & Ors.
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
