Appeal arising from an order attaching appellants' properties. Appellant sought an ex parte stay, which was dismissed for lack of grounds. Notice issued to respondent bank.
Ex parte stay prayer dismissed; notice issued to respondent bank.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Appeal No. 108/2022 Arising out of O.A. No. 2993/2017 (DRT-I, Chandigarh)
M/s Tirth Ram Naresh Kumar & Ors. Vs Canara Bank
07.06.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present: Mr. B.S. Nagar, Ld. Counsel for the appellants
This matter has been taken up by me through Video Conferencing.
The learned counsel for the appellants submits that that vide the impugned order dated 06.05.2022, the learned Presiding Officer, DRT-I, Chandigarh has attached 40 properties of the appellants. He prays for ex parte stay of the aforesaid order.
Heard. No grounds are made out for ex parte stay of the impugned order at this stage.
Issue notice to respondent bank for 10.06.2022 by all permissible modes.
(CHAIRPERSON)
-pk
M/s Tirth Ram Naresh Kumar & Ors.
Canara Bank
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
