This order grants the respondent counsel time to file a reply, adjourns the matter for future hearing, and does not enlarge on the substantive merits of the appeal before it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 108/2022
Between
Mr Umesh Arun Dhamane … Appellant/s V/s. State Bank of India …Respondent/s Mr Dileep S. Paranjpe, Advocate for Respondent No.1 Mr Puneet Gogad, Advocate for Respondent No.2
-: Order dated: 18/11/2022:-
The Ld. Counsel appearing for the Respondents seeks time to file a reply.
Reply, if any, shall be filed within four weeks.
Post on 09.02.2023 for hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-24
1
Umesh Arun Dhamane
State Bank of India
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
