Partly allowed
Mst.Pavitra Pradeep Walvekar v. Bank of India & Ors.
DRATMISC APPEAL/101/2008
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This DST-quashing matter for default dismissal. The appellant's counsel reported no instructions and no response to notices despite claims of issuing notice to the applicant. The court, assuming the appellant lacked interest in pursuance, dismissed the appeal for default along with allied miscellaneous applications as infructuous. Nothing further on the merits or underlying dispute is recorded. Th
What did the court decide?
Appeal dismissed for default; miscellaneous applications, if any, dismissed as infructuous.