The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal adjourned the hearing to allow the appellant's counsel time to rectify a typographical error in the appeal memorandum before the next hearing date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, DELHI
Misc. Appeal No.100/2022 Arising out of S.A.No.179/2022(DRT-III, Delhi)
Shri Satpal Singh Kirar Vs M/s Bank of Baroda
24.11.2022 Hon’ble Mr. Justice Brijesh Sethi
Present : Mr. Sunil Kumar, Ld. Counsel for appellant.
This matter has been taken up by me through Video conferencing.
Ld. Counsel for appellant states that there is typographical error in the M.A. and seeks time to rectify the same. Let him rectify the same before the next date.
List on 13.12.2022 i.e.the date already fixed.
( CHAIRPERSON )
N
Shri Satpal Singh Kirar
M/s Bank of Baroda
Brijesh Sethi
As recorded by the court registry
9 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
