Messers D R Enterprises v. Indian Overseas Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The DRAT at Chennai declined the disputed appeal under Rule 6(4) of the DRAT Procedure Rules, 1994, for non-compliance of office objections within a reasonable time. No substantive reasons are recorded.
What did the court decide?
Appeal declined by reason of non-compliance with office objections within the prescribed time limit.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
A.IR:362/2022
D.R.Enterprises & Ors V/S Indian Overseas Bank
08/12/2022
None for Appellant.
None of the office objections complied yet. Appeal declined in terms of Rule 6 (4) of the DRAT (Procedure) Rules, 1994 as office objections not complied in reasonable time..
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
D.R. Enterprises & Ors
- respondent
Indian Overseas Bank
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · December
- CNR
- 331090003622022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court