Manju Chamundeswari v. Union Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai dismissed the appeal and additional applications (IA 622/2021, IA 623/2021) for default. The appellant was absent, failed to prosecute the matter despite a dismissal notice, and did not pay the deficit court fee.
What did the court decide?
Dismissed IA 621/2021, IA 622/2021 and IA 623/2021 for default.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 621/2021, IA 622/2021 & IA 623/2021 In A.IR:150/2021
Mrs.Manju Chamundeswari V/S Union Bank Of India & Ors
05/07/2022
No representation for petitioner/appellant.
This matter is posted today for dismissal as petitioner/appellant was absent on previous hearing i.e. 25.5.2022.
To give an opportunity to the petitioner/appellant, matter is posted to this day under caption “for dismissal”. In spite of that, petitioner/appellant evinced no interest in prosecuting the application.
Further, petitioner/appellant failed to pay deficit court fee.
Therefore, IA 621/2021 is dismissed for default.
Consequently, other applications, viz., IA 622/2021 (delay) & IA 623/2021 (stay) are dismissed and appeal is rejected.
Sd/Chairperson
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Mrs. Manju Chamundeswari
- respondent
Union Bank Of India
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court