Dismissed
R Lalitha v. Punjab National Bank
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
The appeal filed in the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal was declined because the respondent bank did not comply with office objections within the reasonable time prescribed under Rule 6(4) of the DRAT(Procedure) Rules 1994.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
¶2
A.IR:354/2022
¶3
Mrs.R.Lalitha & Ors V/S Punjab National Bank & Ors
¶4
20/12/2022
¶5
None for Appellant today also.
¶6
None of the office objections complied yet.
¶7
Appeal is declined in terms of Rule 6(4) of the DRAT(Procedure) Rules 1994 as office objections not complied in reasonable time.
¶8
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Mrs. R. Lalitha & Ors
- respondent
Punjab National Bank & Ors
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · December
- CNR
- 331090003542022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
9 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court