Kondal Ready Kantareaddy v. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
(Diary No. 179 of 2019)
(Arising out of O.A. 184 of 2016 in DRT-1, Hyderabad)
THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA
CHAIRPERSON
25.03.2022 Kondal Reddy Kanta Reddy … Appellant Vs. Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited & Another … Respondent Bank None for Appellant Ms. Rituparna aSanyal, Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank
THE APPELLATE TRIBUNAL :
Matter is taken up in the second round but no one is present for the Appellant.
Learned Counsel for Respondent Bank, on instruction, submits that the matter has been settled and seeks leave to produce relevant document on the next date.
Relevant document be produced on the next date so that the matter could be disposed of.
List the matter on 4th April, 2022 for production of document.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Kondal Reddy Kanta Reddy
- respondent
Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited
Coram
Anil Kumar Srivastava
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · March
- CNR
- 191090001792019
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court