A Karthik v. Canara Bank
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
A.IR:364/2022
M/S Prathanya Textiles V/S Canara Bank
21/12/2022
None for Appellant today also.
None of the Office Objections complied yet despite considerable time given.
Appeal declined in terms of Rule 6 (4) of the DRAT(Procedure) Rules 1994 as office objections not complied in time.
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M/S Prathanya Textiles
- respondent
Canara Bank
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · December
- CNR
- 331090003642022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
3 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court