Jesima Garments Rep by N Alikhan and Wahidha Banu v. Bank of Baroda
Case brief
What is this about?
An inter-appellate process record for IA 323/2022 filed by Jesima Garments regarding substituted service. The court listed the matter, noting the respondent bank's legal notice was served but no representation was filed.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 323/2022 In A.IR:254/2022
Jesima Garments & Anr V/S Bank Of Baroda
12/09/2022
Representing counsel for Appellant files Affidavit of substituted service.
Respondent Bank Notice served.
No representation from Respondent Bank.
Call on 26/09/2022 for appearance of respondent Bank and counter if any of respondent bank.
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Jesima Garments & Anr
- respondent
Bank Of Baroda
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · September
- CNR
- 331090002542022
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court