Jalapathy Rao K v. Karnataka Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai declined a civil appeal under Rule 6(4) of the DRAT Procedure Rules 1994 due to non-compliance with office objections regarding Court Fee.
What did the court decide?
The appeal was declined and the matter was disposed of.
What the court decided
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
A.IR:165/2022
Jalapathy Rao.K V/S Karnataka Bank Ltd & Anr
25/07/2022
Appellant’s Counsel present.
Office Objections complied partly.
Office Objections not complied in terms of Court Fee.
Appeal Declined in terms of Rule 6(4) of the DRAT (Procedure ) Rules 1994 as office objections not complied in reasonable time.
Sd/Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Jalapathy Rao.K
- respondent
Karnataka Bank Ltd & Anr
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · July
- CNR
- 331090001652022
- Bench
- R. Sathyanarayanan
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court