Ajit Subhash Mande v. State Bank of India
Case brief
What is this about?
This single-line order adjourned the matter for the respondent to file a reply detailing auction particulars after three weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 537/2022 (WoD) In Appeal on Diary No. 1070/2022
Between
Dr. Ajit Subhash Mande & Anr. … Appellant/s
V/s.
State Bank of India & Anr.
…Respondent/s
Mr Rishabh Shah, i/b M/s. Raval-Shah & Co., Advocate for Appellant. Mr Sachin Koli, Advocate for Respondent No.1 & 2.
-: Order dated 21/10/2022:-
The matter is taken up for hearing by way of praecipe dated 17.10.2022 filed by Appellants seeking urgent relief.
The Respondents appear and Ld. Counsel seeks time to file vakalatnama and a reply on I.A. No. 537/2022.
Reply, if any, shall be filed within three weeks with an advance copy to the other side. The details of the auction which has taken place also shall be furnished in the reply.
Post on 14.11.2022 for reply/hearing.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-8
Dr. Ajit Subhash Mande & Anr.
State Bank of India & Anr.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court