Yadav Transport Company and Ors. v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
null
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
FARAD
Misc Appllcation No. Appllcation No. No. TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI DEBTS In RECOVERY of 20 APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI
Misc Appllcation No. Appllcation No. No.
In of 20 APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, MUMBAI
Appeal No. I. No.
DIN. _of 20
MYac Tonussot Cowanf & oxS. . Appellants
Advocato hlesh tumo
Versus
anaga Balg .Respondents
(Advocate
Date
Office Notes, Appearances
H0322 and Reglstrar's order l Chalrperson's Orders
Appeal presented
by M5Mal2sh humo
Advocate for Appellant with Ho of Rs.256 on
1O3-222 being aggrieved by the impugned order findl order
passed on 23-s1-2022in SA. LOA. No22of 209
by DRT LU Ahuauaj-uls 20-ot.RDDB& F LAct199 18 of
S.A.R.F.A.E.S.I. Act. 2002.
Exh 1 Appeal Memo
sompliance to 232/2022
B 1 | 2 2 2
REGISTRAR
Arraslesh umer Geset
33/ppo
Apeeate time fs emad of ess
emoud odelest luul2e22
P.T.O.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Sri. P.w.gorakh
- Order 2 · Ashok Menon
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court