State Bank of India v. Anjali Vaidya
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-line adjournment order allowing reply to the application for condonation of delay in a banking recovery appeal. No substantive legal principle discussed.
What did the court decide?
Adjournment fixed for 28.09.2022.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 398/2013 (CoD) I.A. No. 397/2013 (Restoration) In
(Appeal No. 165/2007 – Disposed of)
Between
State Bank of India … Appellant/s V/s. Anjali Vaidya & Anr. … Respondent/s
Mr. Vivek Phadke, i/b Mr. Pravin D. Patel, Advocate for Appellants. Ms. Megha Rajpara, i/b Mr. Vikrant, Advocate for Respondent Nos.1 and 2.
-: Order dated: 12/08/2022:-
The Respondent has been served, and a reply to the application for condonation of delay has been also been filed.
Post the matter for reply/hearing on 28.09.2022.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj-1
1
Parties & counsel
- appellant
State Bank of India
- respondent
Anjali Vaidya & Anr.
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page · Ashok Menon
- Order 2 · Ashok Menon
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court