The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Mumbai, via a single judge, condoned the delay for filing a reply in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 44/2022 and posted the matter for further hearing while maintaining the status quo.
Condonation of delay in filing reply; reply filed; status quo order continued; matter posted for hearing on 21.09.2022.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 387/2022 (CoD) In
Misc. Appeal No.44/2022
Between
Union Bank of India … Appellant/s V/s.
Dimple Arcede Premises Co-operative Soc. Ltd. …Respondent/s Mr Hardeep Singh, i/b M/s. Clarus Legal, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. A Rao, i/b M/s. S.K. Singhi & Co., Advocate for Respondent No.1
-: Order dated 26/08/2022:-
I.A. No. 387/2022 is an application for condonation of delay in filing reply.
Heard both sides.
The reasons stated in the application for condoning the delay are acceptable, and the delay in filing a reply is condoned.
The reply is being filed today and a copy has been served on the Ld. Counsel appearing for the Appellant.
Post the matter on 21.09.2022 for hearing.
The status quo order shall continue till then.
Sd/Chairperson
mks-10
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the delay in filing a reply to the condonation application can be condoned.
Union Bank of India
Dimple Arcede Premises Co-operative Soc. Ltd.
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
