This order is for adjourning an application for stay. The respondent was granted time to file a reply within three weeks. No substantive relief was granted or decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
Misc. Appeal No. 124/2022
Between
Punjab National Bank. … Appellant/s V/s. Mr Anil Chandran …Respondent/s
Mr O. A. Das along with Ms Pallavi Chari, Advocate for Appellant. Mr. Ishaan Patkar a/w. Ms Chaitali Raul i/b, Ms Roshni Naik, Advocate for Respondent.
-: Order dated: 29/09/2022:-
The matter is taken up for hearing by way of Praecipe filed on 19.09.2022by the Appellant seeking urgent relief.
The Respondent appeared through Counsel and seeks time to file a reply on I.A. No. 479/2022 which is an application for stay.
The vakalatnama is being filed today.
Reply, if any, shall be filed within three weeks. Post on 26.10.2022 for reply/hearing.
mks-10
1
Punjab National Bank
Mr Anil Chandran
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
