The Appellant filed an application deleting the third respondent. The bench granted the application at risk of the appellant and posted the case for compliance.
Deletion of the 3rd Respondent from the party array.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 282/2022 (Amendment)
in
Appeal No. 127/2012
Between
HDFC Bank Ltd. … Appellant/s V/s. State Bank of India & Ors. …Respondent/s
Ms. Uma Fadia, Advocate for Appellant.
-: Order dated: 12/07/2022 :-
The learned counsel for the Appellant has filed an application for deletion of the 3rd Respondent from the party array.
At the risk of the Appellant said Respondent is deleted from the array of the parties.
I.A. No. 282/2022 stands allowed.
Post on 01.08.2022 before Registrar for compliance.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj-4
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the 3rd Respondent should be deleted from the party array in Appeal No. 127/2012?
1 provisions across 1 enactments
HDFC Bank Ltd.
State Bank of India
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
