Order allowing substitution of the Assignee of the Appellant Bank on the cause title. No substantive legal provision analyzed or outcome determined in this order; procedural direction issued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 225/2022 (Substitution) In
Appeal No. 265/2016
Between
Dena Bank … Appellant/s V/s.
M/s. Shrinathji Spintex Pvt Ltd & Ors. …Respondent/s
Mr. Nilesh Bamne, i/b M/s. A.R. Bamne & Co., Advocate for Appellants.
Mr. Kushal Sawant, i/b Mr. Punnet K. Gogad, Advocate for Respondents
-: Order dated: 25/07/2022:-
The Assignee of the Appellant Bank is now brought on record and the substitution application filed as I.A. No. 225/2022 stands allowed. The amendment to the cause title and other consequential amendments shall be carried out within two weeks.
Respondents are at liberty to file a reply to the regular Appeal within four weeks with an advance copy to the other sides.
Post on 22.08.2022 before Registrar for compliance.
Sd/Chairperson
dpj-10
1
Dena Bank
M/s. Shrinathji Spintex Pvt Ltd
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
