Manikchand Dewasi v. Canara Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
Order relating to an interim application where counsel for the bank sought time to file reply and stated possession would require two weeks' notice.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT : MUMBAI Present : Mr. Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson I.A. No. 163/2022 (WoD)
In
Appeal on Diary No.327/202
Between
Mr. Manikchand Dewasi, Proprietor of … Applicant /s M/s Shree Ganesh Electricals & Plywood
V/s.
Canara Bank & Anr. … Respondent/s
Mr. Rajesh Nagori, along with Mr. Tushar Dahibhawkar & Ms. Aarti Suvarna, Advocate for Appellant.
Mrs. Mittal Parikh, i/b M/s M. V. Kini & Co., Advocate for Respondent No. 1.
-: Order dated : 26/05/2022 :-
The matter is taken up for hearing by way of Praecipe dated 18.05.2022 filed by Appellant for seeking urgent relief since Applicant is apprehending dispossession of the property.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Mr. Manikchand Dewasi
- respondent
Canara Bank
Coram
Ashok Menon
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
4 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court