The Tribunal dismissed an application for amendment of a restoration application by default, noting the appellant's repeated non-appearance and lack of interest in proceeding. All miscellaneous applications were dismissed as infructuous.
Application for amendment dismissed for default; Misc. Applications dismissed as infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
BEFORE THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, AT: MUMBAI Present: Mr Justice Ashok Menon, Chairperson
I.A. No. 109/2020
In
Appeal No. 134/2016 (Disposed of)
Between
Maheshkumar Kalyansinh Mahida & Anr. … Appellant/s V/s.
Dena Bank …Respondent/s
Udayakumar S. Nadar, i/b M/s. Khaitan & Co., Advocate for Respondent No. 1.
-: Order dated: 29/11/2022:-
The Appellant has filed an application for amendment of the application for condonation for the delay in filing the restoration application which is lying in defects that is yet to be cured.
Despite being posted repeatedly, there is no appearance for the Appellant. It appears that Applicant is not keen on proceeding with the matter.
Hence, the application is dismissed for default.
All Misc. Applications, if any, are dismissed as infructuous.
Sd/Chairperson
rm-09
1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether an application for amendment of a condonation application should be dismissed when the applicant fails to appear despite repeated postings.
Maheshkumar Kalyansinh Mahida
Dena Bank
Ashok Menon
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
