This order records a hearing where the court noted service of summons was effective except for respondent no.2, directing subsequent service and a resume date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT KOLKATA
Diary no.374/2021 Date:22/08/2022
Geetanjali Mahapatra...……….Appellant
Vs.
A.O., ICICI Bank Ltd, & Ors……….Respondents
Ld. Counsel, Mr. B. Kr. Das authorised by Ld. Counsel, Mr. P.K. Satpathy is present for appellant and files affidavit for service of summons. On perusal of same, it appears that service is effective upon respondent no.1, 3 to 5 except respondent no.2.
Ld. Counsel, Ms. Ishita Ghosh is present for respondent Bank.
Ld. Counsel for appellant shall make subsequent service upon respondent no.2 to his proper address and file affidavit of service by the next date positively.
Post this matter on 02 .09.2022.
Sd/-
REGISTRAR
Geetanjali Mahapatra
A.O., ICICI Bank Ltd
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
