Electra Menezes v. the Cosmos Co. Operative Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
No substantive issues. The appellate tribunal declined registration of an unrepresented appeal due to failure to remove defects and non-appearance, citing DRAT rules.
What did the court decide?
Diary No. 113/2021 declined for registration as appellant failed to remove defects and did not represent.
What the court decided
Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai
Diary No. 113/2021 [Inward (Lodge) No. 146/2020
Electra Menczes .Appellant
V/s
The Cosmos Co-op Bank Ltd. 8& Ors. Respondents
The Today's Board i.e. 31.03.2022 at 11.30 Hrs. for matters listed before the Registrar for removal of defects/ compliance is displayed in Public Notice on the website of DRT/DRAT and also on Notice Board of DRAT, Mumbai.
No representation for the appellant when matter was called.
This Diary No. 113/2021 was lodged on 29.01.2020. Despite granting reasonable opportunities for removal of defects, the appellant failed to remove the defects noticed by the office also not representing in the matter. Hence, it is presumed that, the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the matter. In view of above & under the provision of sub Rule (4) of Rule 6 DRAT (Procedure) Rules, 1994 the Diary No. 113/2021 [Inward (Lodge) No. 146/2020] is hereby declined for registration.
Rist3/s 212ar, DRAT, Mumbai
31/03/2022
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Electra Menczes
- respondent
The Cosmos Co-op Bank Ltd.
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · March
- CNR
- 271090001132021
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 · Sri. P.w.gorakh
- Order 2 — this page · Sri. P.w.gorakh
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court