Dr S Venkatesh Babu v. City Union Bank Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal dismissed three continuance applications filed by appellants. The tribunal noted that a writ petition challenging the Tribunal's order had been dismissed by the Madras High Court, rendering the applications infructuous or no longer surviving.
What did the court decide?
Applications IA 610/2021, IA 185/2021, and IA 186/2021 were dismissed. IA 610 was dismissed for survival of writ; others dismissed as infructuous.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNA
IA 610/2021 (Extension of time of pre-deposit), IA 185/2021 (Stay) & IA 186/2021 (Direction)
in
A.IR:54/2021
Dr.S. Venkatesh Babu & Anr ... Appellants
Vs
A.O.,City Union Bank Ltd & Anr ... Respondents
06/05/2022
Representing counsel Shri A. Periasamy for Ld. Counsel Shri A. Joseph Dorairaj for petitioners/appellants and Ld. Counsel Shri R. Sivaraman for R1 & R2 are present.
Advocate for petitioners/appellants sought time.
Advocate for respondents represented that Writ Petition filed by the appellants before Hon’ble High Court of Madras (Madurai Bench) against the order of this Tribunal is already dismissed on 4.3.2022.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the continuance applications survive after dismissal of the writ petition against the Tribunal's order.
Whether further time should be granted for compliance with the conditional order dated 22.9.2021.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Dr. S. Venkatesh Babu & Anr
- respondent
A.O., City Union Bank Ltd
- respondent
Anr
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- DRAT
- Decided on
- · May
- CNR
- 331090000542021
- Topic
- Banking and Recovery
All orders in this case
5 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court