Chacko John v. Indian Overseas Bank
Case brief
What is this about?
The Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal at Chennai recorded that no representation was filed by the appellant and counsel for the bank reported non-service of documents, deferring appropriate orders for a future date.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
IN THE DEBT RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL AT CHENNAI
IA 968/2019 In A.IR:280/2019
Chako John V/S A.O.,Indian Oversaeas Bank & Ors
19/08/2022
No representation from Appellant.
Counsel for R1 Bank states that documents not served despite directions to that effect and hence no counter filed.
Call on 12/09/2022 before Hon’ble Chairperson for appropriate orders.
Sd/- Registrar
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Chako John
- respondent
A.O., Indian Overseas Bank & Ors
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
28 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court